Avoidance-Avoidance Conflict
Definition:
Avoidance-avoidance conflict is a psychological phenomenon characterized by the experience of being faced with two undesirable or unpleasant options or outcomes, often resulting in feelings of anxiety, stress, or indecision.
Subtypes of Avoidance-Avoidance Conflict:
- Approach-Avoidance Conflict: In this type of conflict, an individual is simultaneously attracted to and repelled by the same goal or situation. They experience the desire to approach a particular outcome, but also have reservations due to perceived negative consequences.
- Double Avoidance Conflict: This conflict occurs when an individual must choose between two undesirable alternatives, both of which have negative outcomes. The individual may feel stuck and torn between these options, leading to heightened distress.
- Approach-Approach Conflict: While technically not an avoidance-avoidance conflict, this subtype involves choosing between two desirable options, resulting in conflict because the individual can only choose one. Although both choices have positive outcomes, the decision-making process can still be challenging and stressful.
Effects and Coping Strategies:
Avoidance-avoidance conflict can lead to emotional distress, decision paralysis, and heightened anxiety levels. Individuals may employ various coping strategies to deal with this conflict, such as seeking external advice, evaluating potential risks and benefits, prioritizing alternatives, or attempting to find a compromise between the available options. Understanding and developing effective coping mechanisms can help individuals mitigate the negative impact of avoidance-avoidance conflicts on their well-being.